Home / Software Posts / System Head Curves in Closed Systems

System Head Curves in Closed Systems

Tom Walski Profile Image

Tom Walski, Ph.D, P.E, Senior Product Manager, Water

water treatment cycle for drinking water
water treatment cycle for drinking water

Share

An important step in selecting pumps is developing the system head curve, which gives the head needed to move various flow rates through a pumped system.

The shape of this curve depends on

  1. The lift to be provided between tank water levels on the suction and discharge sides of the pump
  2. Friction losses through the system.

If most of the energy goes to lifting the water, the curves are relatively flat since lift is independent of flow, while if most of the energy is used to overcome friction, the slope will be steep.

Simple CaseĀ 

In the case where the flow moves from one tank to the next with a single pipe, the system head curve is easy to develop and can be done manually, as shown in Fig. 1 below.

A diagram illustrating a system head curve in closed systems features a graph of head versus flow. Labels identify lift, head loss, HGL, suction tank, pump, and discharge tank for enhanced SEO keywords.
Fig 1

Real System

Real water and wastewater pumping system are more complicated to the extent that it is necessary to use a model such as WaterGEMS to develop these curves. Plus, there will be different curves for different combinations of tank levels and local demands.

Diagram illustrating a system head curve with a flow vs. head graph on the left. On the right, a closed pump system diagram features a suction tank, pump, discharge tank, and hydraulic gradient line (HGL), highlighting key elements of closed systems.
Fig 2

Dead end system

The problem becomes more difficult when pumping into a closed (dead end) system with no tank. In this case, determining the lift becomes problematic because there is no water surface to lift the water to. The water only reaches atmospheric pressure when it leaves an orifice (e.g. faucet, shower head, washing machine). Head loss through the orifices becomes important.

Diagram illustrating fluid flow through an orifice with equations and variables labeled, ideal for understanding closed systems. The title reads "Single Pipe to Orifice," and the bottom includes the Bentley logo. Perfect for exploring system dynamics or enhancing SEO keywords in engineering contexts.
Fig 3

If the water system only has a single orifice, it is easy to develop the curve with the equation in Fig. 3, but real water system feed thousands or millions or orifices, each at its own elevation. While water distribution system models, do not model every orifice, they do distribute demands to many nodes, each with its own demand and elevation. Using the fact that demands through orifices are pressure dependent, WaterGEMS can generate system head curves for systems with and without tanks with equal ease.

With and without tanks

How do system head curves for systems with and without tanks differ?

As shown in the Fig. 4 below, the hydraulic grade downstream of the pump doesnā€™t differ much as flow changes in systems with tanks. But with orifices flow, the hydraulic grade needed varies widely with demand and results in much steeper system head curves. This is shown below for a simple case.

Graph titled "System Head Curve" depicting the head (m) vs. flow (L/s) in closed systems with two lines: one labeled "Tank," one "No Tank." Includes parameters: H1, H2, z, n, k, and K. Bentley logo positioned at the bottom right.
Fig 4

Temporal aspect of system head curves

Then there is the temporal aspect of system head curves. In almost all cases, there is not a single system head curve but a band of curves that vary depending water levels in tanks, which other pumps are running, and demand patterns of users between the pump and the tanks/orifices. For systems with tanks, these variations are usually small, which results in a narrow band of curves. However, for systems with no tanks, the curves are very sensitive to demands and will vary widely from the peak hour of the day to time of minimum demands. The impacts of these variations on system head curves are shown in Fig. 5 below, taken from WaterGEMS.

A system head curve graph for closed systems displays flow rate (L/s) versus head (m) with multiple colored curves in a user-friendly software interface.
Fig 5

Some may argue that in closed systems, demands ae not pressure dependent and the system head curve can be approximated by vertical lines corresponding to each demand. As can be seen in Fig. 5 above, the system head curves do not appear vertical.

The methods available in WaterGEMS make it easy to generate system head curves for systems that engineers couldnā€™t handle in the past.

Reference:

Walski, T., Hartell, W. and Wu, Z., 2010, ā€œDeveloping System Head Curves for Closed Systems,ā€ Journal AWWA, Vol. 102, No. 9. P. 84-89.

Read more of Tomā€™s blogs here, and you can contact him at [email protected].

Want to learn more from our resident water and wastewater expert? Join the Dr. Tom Walski Newsletter today!

Relevant Tags

Cities and towns often rely on local consultants to provide them with water, wastewater, and stormwater modeling. By bringing modeling ...

Seminal papers are groundbreaking at the time of publication and remain influential many years later. I recently received word from ...

Back in the dark ages (e.g., the 1980s) before everyone had video capabilities on their cell phones, creating a training ...

Subscribe to The Bentley Brief

Stay ahead of the curve with the latest infrastructure news and insights.